Please stop making tv shows like movies

Television and cinema are two very different media. Sure, sometimes you can see TV shows turned into movie offshoots, or movies lead into TV show spinoffs – but the two aren’t as similar as you might think. They are two independent forms of visual media, each with their own beauty and finer detail, and their differences have become clearer as digital media has evolved.

So why do people want TV shows to be made at the production level of a movie?

Since the development of so-called “prestige television“, featuring “The Sopranos”, “The West Wing” and “Mad Men”, the television industry has received much acclaim for setting a standard for well-produced hour-long shows with deep character. and finely written development. The main characteristics of these productions include complicated characters with sometimes questionable behavior, episodes with complex plots, and the development of a story or character spanning several seasons. These shows constitute this often referred to as the “golden age of television”, responsible for some of the best shows audiences have ever seen.

Obviously, not all shows made during this era were intended to be a “prestige TV show”. In the days of cable television, a major feature was the prominence of a show assigned by its timeslot in a weekly schedule; a Friday show at 9 p.m. takes precedence over a Monday show at 11 p.m. Thus, these chains could easily separate the emissions which aimed for the place “prestige” of the emissions which were not it.

This separation is far from the norm in today’s television world. As we experiment with the streaming paradigm, shows and all of their episodes are available to us at the click of a button. The previous time separation between shows is gone, and now my Netflix recommendations have “Indian Matchmaking” on the same line as “The Queen’s Gambit.“It has changed the way we understand what prestige television is: now that all the shows are under the same umbrella, people are more and more inclined to compare them to each other.

An episode of a TV show doesn’t have to be the best visual medium to grace the screen – it doesn’t have to be shot on camera or written by a team of 30 writers to be considered ” Well “. .” The beauty of television is that it doesn’t have to be an award-winning 10-layer wedding cake. Sometimes TV can be a simple plate of chopped fresh fruit that your mother brings to you without asking – refreshing, easy to consume and served with an untold amount of love and attention.

I’m not saying shows like “Euphoria,” HBO’s hyper-stylized soap opera, aren’t great shows – I’m just saying there’s no reason we should blindly rate an episode of Euphoria ten times more than a random episode of “The Bachelorette.” With multinational media conglomerates pumping money into streaming services to create the next viral show, expectations of good mainstream television are changing. As we enter an era of prestige streaming, shows from two different TV subgenres can be found on the same service, leading to audience comparisons.

Sometimes the aspects of TV that people consider “less serious” than movies are what makes the medium so special. The advantage of a TV series is that you are allowed to add plotlines and sub-stories to episodes that don’t have to be solely concerned with the show’s main narrative. Movies don’t have that privilege – everything has to fit in a few hours and directors are forced to cut the fat.

TV shows have more time and space to tell the not-so-important stories of the show’s world. And sometimes that’s what makes TV so much more like the real world; life is not like a movie where everything that happens is super important and you solve all your problems in two hours. Life is more like a bunch of seasons where in some episodes nothing really happens, but you still enjoy it because you’re surrounded by people and places you love, even if you don’t have a major life-changing event every day.

I think shows like “Euphoria” often take themselves too seriously, casting each of their episodes like movies. There are no extra fluff and everything is consciously directed towards a set of main plots. And while that’s definitely a storytelling strategy in visual media, that doesn’t make it inherently better than doing the opposite. Having subplots that exist for their own sake rather than a larger point is more true to real life and can be quite entertaining.

In the end, it comes down to your personal preferences. I’m someone who would prefer a Christmas-themed episode of a show that has little to do with the main story, rather than a two-hour finale where you have to focus on every small detail. The absence of an IMAX camera and a blank budget in the production of a show does not mean that it deserves less respect as an audiovisual medium. “Euphoria” is a show well done, and I’m sure there are people who really love this kind of visual art. But in my opinion, this isn’t a show we’re going to be looking back on and watching reruns from five years later.

Editor’s Note: This article is a review and includes thoughts, opinions, and subjective criticism.

Comments are closed.